Editor's Note
Organizing The MFA Annual is always an exciting project.
For all of us at New American Paintings, it is like getting a private view into the future of painting. That is not to say that the future of painting is determined only by artists who choose to pursue a graduate degree. Attaining a Master of Fine Arts degree is ultimately a personal decision—one which artists make for a variety of reasons. There is, however, something about the crucible of the MFA—the multitude of ways that artists are challenged, both formally and critically—that generates a lot of interesting, forward-thinking work. Artists may be born and not made, but there is no doubt that MFA programs are now firmly entrenched within the art world’s meta-structure.
This year we received close to eight hundred applications from artists affiliated with more than ninety art schools. The ways in which faculty members and the historical legacy of various schools can influence their students’ practices is notable. After doing this for so many years, I have reached the point where oftentimes I can accurately guess the school that an applicant is affiliated with based on their work alone. This, of course, has much to do with each school’s vetting process and the specific criteria they look for when evaluating a potential graduate candidate. Some MFA programs—Yale, Virginia Commonwealth University (VCU), and UCLA among them—produce artists whose work is underpinned with extraordinary conceptual rigor. Others, such as the New York Academy of Art, RISD, and Columbia University, produce artists who often forefront technical mastery in…










