Talking Technology with Bonard Hughins (#94)
Written by Andrew Katz Katz

EC: I was really drawn to your pieces because of the way in which you are mimicking something so technical and technological (the CMYK color process), but you are doing so by hand with traditional painterly techniques and mediums (acrylic on canvas). Does your process speak to your feelings about technology? BH: I've always been interested in taking a concept, theory, or method and looking for new applications for it. In this series it's just taking an already existing process and applying in reverse of its intentions. It kind of defeats the purpose of the original purpose of the CMYK process. The printing process was developed for speedy mass production in order to reach as many people as possible. With this series it's using the same concept of production, but by hand instead of a press, to create a singular object that will not be seen by many. With all of the possibilities that technology affords, there are so many variations on what can be done. I think how technology is perceived is up to the artist and also to the time they live in. I feel the relationship between people and technology changes from generation to generation.
EC: What first led you to incorporate this aesthetic and process into your acrylics? BH: My dad had a print shop when I was growing up. I think being in that environment influenced me without me realizing it. While working there years ago, I tried the same process with stencils and spray paint and it worked well. This time I wanted to try it with more control and have a more personal touch in the process. I've used oils, India ink, and screen printing ink along with acrylic to see which medium works best. I was also interested in how this technique would translate on a larger scale. EC: You call your approach "multilingual in the visual sense." How do you see your work as a means of communicating? BH: I think the more methods, medium, and approaches you have experience with, the better it helps you with ways of communicating. It's like having an expanded vocabulary. But from experience, I think trying too many new things at once can dilute ideas. EC: I love this idea that the more mediums you are fluent in, the more expanded your vocabulary. And it is interesting how your style cross-references this totally mechanized process while also recreating a kind of new Pop art, reminiscent of Roy Lichtenstein and his use of Ben-Day dots. You depart from this on many levels, though, making the images personal, detailed, and compelling in their intimate depiction of your loved family and friends. BH: I like the idea of it looking what to some is Pop art, but the people that are the subject of this series not being popular figures.
I once had an art dealer tell me that he could sell these paintings if they were of celebrities. Why paint an image of someone whose face and name is already scattered across the media landscape? I don't want to contribute anything to that. I'm also fascinated with the idea that the people I've painted are people I presently know, and these paintings will be a reminder of this time for me and them years down the line.
Written by
Andrew Katz Katz
More stories
View allTHE MAGAZINE
Explore our magazine to discover exceptional artists

Call for Artists
Submit your work for consideration
New American Paintings is a juried exhibition-in-print and digital, presenting the work of 40 emerging artists in each issue.
Your gateway to new art
Discover tomorrow's art stars, today

PRINT + EARLY ACCESS DIGITAL SUBSCRIPTION
$179/YEAR
DIGITAL SUBSCRIPTION
$99/YEAR OR $10/MONTH
Each issue of New American Paintings features forty artists selected through our juried competitions—presented in a beautifully curated, full-color publication. Subscribers receive six issues per year, plus exclusive online access to current and past editions. Are you a collector? Consider our premium subscription and receive our museum-quality printed publication + access to each new digital issue two weeks before its general release.



